Good aspects of the LGESJ website are...
- Research Councils are held at frequent intervals and also well-reported
- Well organized and up-to-date information are provided in easy to understand ways
- Activity reports are not fluently written
- Bulletins of the academic society can not be read without registration as a subscriber
- Few visual supports / viewpoints
This blog entry is a good start in evaluating the good and bad websites that you identified. But, don't forget to do your more detailed analysis by accessing the excellent sets of questions at: http://21cif.com/tools/evaluate/ .
返信削除